Strateva

Pricing

One price per validation. Three sizes of analysis.

Every plan runs the same engine, the same methodology and the same tests. What you choose is how many combinations of strategy, asset and timeframe you want validated.

One engine. One methodology. Three sizes of analysis.

We do not hold the important tests back for the expensive plan. Choose how many combinations of strategy, asset and timeframe you want validated.

What one validation is

One validation = 1 strategy version × 1 asset × 1 timeframe.

A change to the rules is a new version. An extra asset is another validation. An extra timeframe is another validation.

  • Single

    €59

    1 validation

    Typical use

    One strategy on one asset.

    Founding ValidationThe first 20 Single validations are sold at this price.

    Check compatibility

  • Research

    €249

    5 validations

    Typical use

    Comparing assets, versions or timeframes.

    Check compatibility

  • Portfolio

    €599

    15 validations

    Typical use

    Several strategies, or broad coverage.

    Check compatibility

Every plan includes exactly the same work

Same engine, same methodology, same tests, same verdict system, same human review, same report. The only commercial difference between the plans is how many validations you get.

  • Validation Scope confirmed with you
  • Data and configuration frozen
  • Isolated execution
  • Reconcilable metrics
  • Classic Monte Carlo
  • Permuted Monte Carlo
  • Benchmark comparison
  • Deterministic verdict
  • Human review
  • Final report

Compatibility first. Payment only once the scope is agreed.

Is your strategy a fit?

Compatibility is checked before anything is charged. Most of it you can judge yourself from this list.

What you can send for assessment

You can send code, Pine Script, a trade list or written systematic rules. First we check whether the material can be turned into a reproducible specification. If it is not compatible with the engine or with the current scope, you are not charged.

  • Python
  • Pine Script
  • AI-generated code
  • Trade logs
  • Written systematic rules

Being accepted for assessment is not the same as being compatible. The assessment is what establishes that, and it happens before any money changes hands.

A strategy is usually a fit if

  • The rules are systematic.
  • You can name the assets and the timeframe.
  • There is code, Pine Script, a trade list, or rules written precisely enough to be reproduced.
  • There is a backtest, or material that can be reproduced.
  • It is close to a shadow-trading decision.
  • Its main exposure is spot.

What gets caught before you are charged

  • Derivatives.
  • Discretionary rules that cannot be formalised.
  • Incompatible data.
  • Unsupported frequencies.
  • Multi-asset strategies that cannot be separated.
  • Insufficient material.

If the material is not compatible with the engine or with the current scope, you are not charged.

The compatibility check is a real review, not an automatic form. That is why the answer takes a little longer, and why it is worth something.

What the price means

  • The scope is confirmed before payment.
  • If the material is not compatible, you are not charged.
  • A change to the rules is a new version, and a new validation.
  • An additional asset is a new validation.
  • An additional timeframe is a new validation.
  • A favourable result is not guaranteed.
  • There are no discounts conditional on the verdict.

Have something that needs an independent check?

Describe the strategy, the backtest or the model. The scope and the price are confirmed with you before any work starts.

Request a validation

Nothing runs, and nothing is charged, before you approve the scope.

The information you submit will be used to assess your request. Read the privacy policy.